教育部學術倫理電子報
學術界公開傳播研究成果的途徑相當多元，其中包含了最常⾒的學位論⽂與研討會論⽂等著作形式。⽽當前還有另⼀種知識傳播型態也時常被提出來討論，那就是「預印本論⽂」（preprint）。本期主題文章，將介紹預印本論⽂之出版倫理相關議題，讓學術界各⽅機構與⼈⼠能熟悉預印本論⽂之出版倫理與其在知識傳播上所應關注的重點。第二部分「中心新訊」回顧過去一季AREE的更新，包括課程單元名稱異動公告、新增一款海報與四部情境影片、111學年度新生上課須知，詳情請點此見第4頁。
五、結語
預印本論⽂的出現已逐漸成為研究⼈員發表研究成果的重要管道，也促進了知識傳播以及協助新進研究⼈員的學術專業發展。近年學術界對於預印本論⽂所涉及的出版倫理議題雖有⼀些討論，但共識尚不明朗，包括出版倫理之原則性規範未臻完善、⼀稿多投與重複出版之疑義，以及重複資訊所造成的數位倉儲負荷問題等，這些都是預印本論⽂的投稿者可能會⾯臨到的問題。建⽴⼀個能持續監督、檢驗與改進的預印本論⽂品質管理機制，是當前學術各界應共同努⼒的⽅向。
參考文獻
【中文書目】
王秀華（2019）。淺談預印本相關的學術倫理問題。教育部學術倫理專案辦公室電⼦報，6，3-5。https://ethics.moe.edu.tw/files/resource/epaper/epaper_moe_201909.pdf
林雯瑤（2003）。電⼦預⾏本與學術傳播。圖書資訊學刊，1(2)，59-80。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2003.1(2).059
傅雅秀（2003）。傳統和電⼦預印本被引⽤之情形。圖書資訊學刊，1(2)，81-94。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2003.1(2).081
⿈慕萱、嚴⽵蓮（2016）。同儕審查的起源、研究現況與展望。圖書資訊學刊，14(1)，41-85。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2016.14(1).041
【西文書目】
Andrés, A. (2009). 5 - Scientific collaborations. In Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study (pp. 41-53). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/.B978-1-84334-528-2.50005-9
Berg, J. M., Bhalla, N., Bourne, P. E., Chalfie, M., Drubin, D. G., Fraser, J. S., Greider,C. W., Hendricks, M., Jones, C., Kiley, R., King, S., Kirschner, M. W., Krumholz, H. M., Lehmann, R., Leptin, M., Pulverer, B., Rosenzweig, B., Spiro, J. E.,
Stebbins, M., ... Wolberger, C. (2016). Preprints for the life sciences. Science, 352(6288), 899-901. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9133
bioRxiv. (n.d.). Submission guide. https://www.biorxiv.org/submit-a-manuscript
Borgman, C. L. (2007). 5: The discontinuity of scholarly publishing. In Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet (pp. 75-114). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7434.003.0008
Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission [Editorial]. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
Cabanac, G., Oikonomidi, T., & Boutron, I. (2021). Day-to-day discovery of preprint-publication links. Scientometrics, 126, 5285-5304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03900-7
Chiarelli, A., Johnson, R., Richens, E., & Pinield, S. (2019). Accelerating scholarly communication: The transformative role of preprints [Report]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3357727
Cobb, M. (2017). The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PLOS Biology, 15(11), e2003995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2017). Preprints: What are the issues? Notes from the forum discussion. https://publicationethics.org/resources/forum-discussion-topics/cope-forum-24-july-2017-preprints-what-are-issues
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2018). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.24318/R4Wbyao2
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2019). WCRI 2019: Preprints and their place in the publication ethics landscape. https://publicationethics.org/preprints-wcri
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.
Cruz, J. M. B., & Krichel, T. (2000). Cataloging economics preprints: An introduction to the RePEc project. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 3(2-3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1300/J141v03n02_08
Gopalakrishna, G. (2021). Preprint advocates must also fight for research integrity. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02481-y
Harnad, S. (2000). Ingelfinger over-ruled. The Lancet Perspectives, 365, S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)92002-6
Heidary, F., & Gharebaghi, R. (2021). COVID-19 impact on research and publication ethics [Editorial]. Medical Hypothesis Discovery and Innovation in Ophthalmology, 10(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1414
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing (5th ed.). International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf
Massey, D. S., Opare, M. A., Wallach, J. D., Ross, J. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2020). Assessment of preprint policies of top-ranked clinical journals. JAMA Network Open, 3(7), e2011127. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11127
Public Library of Science. (2019, August 22). medRxiv to PLOS: Direct preprint transfers. PLOS Blog. https://theplosblog.plos.org/2019/08/medrxiv-to-plos-direct-preprint-transfers/
Ravinetto, R., Caillet, C., Zaman, M. H., Singh, J. A., Guerin, P. J., Ahmad, A., Durán, C. E., Jesani, A., Palmero, A., Merson, L., Horby, P. W., Bottieau, E., Hoffmann, T., & Newton, P. N. (2021). Preprints in times of COVID19: The time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices. BMC Medical Ethics, 22, Article 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00667-7
Sakellaropoulou, R. (2019, May 28). Four things to know about Springer Nature’s new preprint policy. Springer Nature. https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/the-source/blog/blogposts-open-research/five-things-to-know-about-springer-nature-s-new-preprint-policy/16747974
Smith, A. P. (2000). The journal as an overlay on preprint databases. Learned Publishing, 13(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1087/09531510050145542
Springer Nature. (n.d.). Publication ethics. https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/publication-ethics/1378
